PDPA compliant and confidentialReply within 15 minutes, 7 days a weekGuiding Singapore students since 2010
Engineering solutions, lab reports and FYP writing since 2010
"My final number matches the answer key, so why did I get 4 out of 10?" Usually it is the missing units, the unstated assumptions or the free-body diagram nobody showed you how to draw. Or your lab readings refuse to match the theory and the report is due.
An engineer from your branch solves your problem set with every step shown, writes up your lab or FYP report from your own data, finishes what you started, or finds the slip in your working and fixes it.
Pick your starting point
Yes. Tell us what you have, from a blank problem sheet to a finished FYP report, and an engineer from your branch picks it up from there.
Live, one-to-one sessions on your own problem sheet, covering how each problem is set up and why each step follows.
Full worked solutions to your problem sheet or design brief: given data, diagrams, assumptions, formulas, units on every line and a checked final answer.
You have the readings, some graphs and part of the write-up. We complete the missing sections from your own data, in the same format.
Your answer is off and you can't see why. An engineer traces your working line by line and corrects it from the first wrong step.
The engineering is done. You want the report to read like a professional technical document.
Heard in engineering
Engineering students rarely lack ability. They run out of hours, or nobody showed them how working is marked. These are the lines we hear most.
One missing reaction force changes every line after it, and method marks go with it.
That gap is usually the discussion section, not a broken rig. Explaining it is where the marks are.
Code without comments or a link to the model earns few marks in a report.
Results are shown but never compared with predictions, literature or the original objectives.
Direct-entry students meet matrix methods and transfer functions with less time to catch up.
A failed test is still a result. Explaining why it failed, from your own data, is a discussion chapter an engineer can write.
Set it up first
Most lost marks come from the set-up, not the arithmetic. Work through these five checks before you touch a formula.
Write every value with its unit and convert to SI before you touch a formula.
Free-body diagram, circuit diagram or control volume. Most wrong answers trace back to a missing force or a wrong direction.
Steady state, rigid body, ideal gas, negligible friction. They decide which equations apply, and markers look for them.
Equilibrium, energy balance, Kirchhoff's laws or the code clause your brief names. Write it in symbols before substituting numbers.
Is the magnitude believable? Do the units come out right? Does the sign make physical sense?
Tasks we solve
Each discipline tends to slip in a different place. Here is where marks usually go, and what you get back when an engineer does the work.
Civil
Civil
Mechanical
Mechanical
Electrical
Electrical
Software and tools
Yes. Tell us the software and version your module uses, and the work comes back in that tool, commented and explained in the report.
Scripts and models built to your brief, with comments that tie each block to the equation it solves.
Parts, assemblies and drawings set up to your template, with the design reasoning written alongside.
Mesh, boundary conditions and loads chosen and justified, with results checked against a hand calculation.
Your readings processed, plotted and analysed, with error bars and the uncertainty worked through.
Method marks
Two answers to the same beam question. Both reach the same number, but only one earns the method marks.
Answer only: low marks
Full working: method marks
Illustrative example with made-up values. Your solution follows your own brief, data and the code your module uses.
From brief to solution
From the moment you send the brief, you know who is working on it and when it arrives.
Questions, given data, lab readings, the code or standard named, software version and deadline. Anything unclear, we ask before quoting.
Structures to a civil engineer, control systems to an electrical engineer. Price and date agreed in writing.
For design work and long reports, you see the method, assumptions and structure before the full working starts.
Every step shown, units throughout, code clauses cited and code files commented, by one engineer from start to finish.
A second reader re-checks key calculations, units, final answers and the report against the brief.
Solutions, report and files, plus a short walkthrough so you can follow each step. Free revisions against the original brief.
Half finished
You don't need to start again. Send what you have and we complete it from your own data and in your format.
Raw readings, graphs, code, the report template and any supervisor comments.
Sound sections stay. Anything a marker would query is flagged.
Sections, word budget and delivery date, priced only on what's left.
Same template, symbols and figure style, with changes marked.
FYP stages
A final-year project runs in stages, and most students need help at one or two of them. The build and the testing are yours; we write and fix the documents around them, chapter by chapter, with the same engineer.
Problem statement, objectives, scope and plan, written from your supervisor's topic and your ideas.
A themed review of real, recent sources that shows the gap your project fills.
Your design decisions, test set-up and simulation approach written up clearly and justified.
Written from your own test or simulation data, compared with predictions, with the discrepancies explained. Results are never invented.
Chapters joined into one argument, limitations stated as scope decisions, and the poster condensed from the report.
By study level
From ITE and poly to degree and FYP. The price depends on the type of work and your deadline; what a marker looks for changes as you move up.
Higher Nitec students are marked on showing every working step cleanly, even when the final numerical answer is already correct.
algebra and trigonometry · basic calculus · unit conversions
Typical papers
calculation set
Marks are lost for skipping working steps even when the final answer is right.
hand tools · basic circuits · measurement accuracy
Typical papers
practical report
Measurements are recorded without noting instrument error or tolerance.
orthographic projection · dimensioning · CAD basics
Typical papers
drawing assignment
Dimensions are missing or placed where the drawing becomes hard to read.
One problem set
How one gauge-pressure slip was found, fixed and kept out of the last four questions.
A six-question thermofluids set due in four days, two questions attempted, and neither answer matching the key.
He worked part-time on weekends and had come in from poly with good practical skills but little practice in formal working. Both attempted questions used gauge pressure in the ideal gas equation, so the error carried into every line after it.
An engineer marked the slip in both questions, corrected the working from that line on, and then wrote full solutions to the remaining four: system boundary drawn, assumptions stated, steam-table values referenced and units on every line. A short WhatsApp walkthrough covered the energy balance in the longest question.
“I'd been using gauge pressure there all semester and never knew why my answers drifted.”
The full set arrived a day before his deadline, with the two corrected questions, four worked solutions and a one-page note on the pressure slip. Nobody promised a mark.
Illustrative example based on common student situations, not a specific individual.
Choose your service
Five services side by side, from a live method session to full worked solutions. Start from what you have on your desk today.
You send
You get
Best for
Your engineer
Engineering work is matched by discipline and by the software your module uses, so a control systems question and a concrete design go to different engineers. One engineer stays on your order.
Showing all 6 experts
MEng | Electrical & Electronics Expert (SIT Graduate)
EEE Modules, Circuit Design & Control Systems, Power Electronics
Dev handles electrical and electronic engineering assignments, including circuit analysis, control systems and lab reports.
MSc | Civil Engineering Coursework Pro (SMU)
Structural Analysis, Construction Reports, BPM301 & Built Environment
Fiona covers civil and structural engineering tasks, including built-environment modules, with clear workings and properly formatted reports.
MSc | Mechanical Systems Expert (NTU Graduate)
Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, CAD Simulations
Marcus works on mechanical coursework and CAD-based tasks, keeping reports clear and calculations well documented.
MSc | Mechanical Engineering Expert (NTU Graduate)
Fluid Dynamics, Thermodynamics, Machine Design
Marcus helps with mechanical engineering assignments, showing calculations step by step and explaining the engineering principles behind them.
PhD | Computer Engineering Expert (NUS Graduate)
Programming & Coding, Artificial Intelligence, Software Systems
Sarah works on programming and AI tasks, delivering commented code and short explanations so students understand how the solution works.
MEng | Chemical Engineering Expert (SIT Graduate)
Chemical Reactions, Plant & Process Design, Process Safety
Arjun covers chemical and process engineering assignments, from reaction calculations to process safety reports.
Swipe to see more experts.
Student feedback
Feedback from poly, degree and FYP students on calculations, MATLAB work, lab reports and design reports.
4.5
Average of all 4 reviews on this page — browse with the arrows
“I needed urgent help with a thermodynamics assignment, and they handled it fast. The content was accurate, well-explained, and formatted exactly how my professor wanted. Super happy with the result!”
“My software engineering assignment was confusing, but the expert broke it down so clearly. The code worked, and the comments made it easy to understand. It felt like a real engineer wrote it!”
“They helped me complete my structural engineering project report. Everything from the diagrams to the analysis was on point. I even got free changes after my lecturer's feedback. Worth it!”
“I was worried about AI-written work, but they assured me it’s all human-written. My fluid mechanics paper was original and passed the plagiarism check easily. Felt safe and confident submitting it.”
First names only, to protect student privacy.
Technical rates
Calculation and technical work uses the technical rate per 250 words, and problem sets can be quoted per question. Your deadline sets the band, and the quote is in writing before you pay.
| Per 250 words | 10+ days | 3–5 days | 24 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| General assignments | S$15 | S$20 | S$30 |
| Essays | S$18 | S$25 | S$35 |
| SUSS TMA / GBA | S$22 | S$30 | S$45 |
| PhD / dissertation | S$25 | S$35 | S$55 |
| Technical / coding this page | S$30 | S$45 | S$65 |
Problem sets quoted per question
Free Turnitin similarity report on your final draft
Software and simulation files reviewed as part of your quote
Fixed SGD quote before you pay
Why students stay
Engineering degrees stack one module on the last. These are the reasons engineering students give for keeping the same engineer.
Working shown line by line, units throughout. No unexplained jumps.
Lab and FYP reports are written from your own readings and test results.
The same expert stays on your project, revisions included.
Send notes, files or questions on WhatsApp while the work is in progress.
Files used only for your order. We never contact your school.
Problem sets, lab reports and FYPs for Singapore students since 2010.
Campus to campus
Everything runs online, so NUS, NTU, SUTD, SIT, poly and ITE students send the same problem sheets to the same engineers, wherever they study.
Beyond engineering
Engineering degrees also set essays, reflections and long dissertations. These pages handle those.
See how an expert reads a design brief in our NTU heat exchanger brief breakdown, or read reviews from engineering students.
Engineering FAQs
Answers on data, software, deadlines, privacy and price for engineering work.
Yes. Send the problem sheet, any given data and the deadline. An engineer from your branch writes full solutions with diagrams, stated assumptions, units on every line and the code clause cited where one applies.
Yes. You don't need to understand the question to send it. The engineer solves it in clear steps with short notes on what each one does, or explains it live if you'd rather learn the method.
The brief, marking scheme, lab sheet and raw readings, any code or standard named, your software version and files, and the deadline. Lecture notes and worked examples from class help the solution match your module's conventions.
No. Reports are written from your own readings. If results don't match theory, the engineer explains the discrepancy through error analysis, which is usually where the discussion marks are.
Often, yes. Send it now and we'll tell you honestly how many questions can be solved well in the time left before you pay.
Yes. We keep your sections that work, complete the missing ones from your data and template, and mark every change. You pay only for what's left.
Yes. FYP and capstone reports can be delivered in stages, from proposal to final report, with the same engineer throughout so the chapters stay consistent.
Yes. Tell us the software and version your module uses. Code is commented, models are set up to your brief, and outputs are explained in the report.
Whichever your module names, usually IEEE, APA or Harvard. Every source is real and checkable, from textbooks, standards and journal papers.
No. Every solution and report is worked by a person. AI tools make confident arithmetic and unit errors, and invent references.
Yes. Message your engineer on WhatsApp to send extra data, ask about a step or check progress.
Yes. Files are handled under Singapore's PDPA and used only for your order, and we never contact your school. If your FYP uses an industry partner's data, check what you're allowed to share first.
Nothing on Singapore's statute book targets academic writing, editing or tutoring services as such. Each university, polytechnic and ITE sets its own rules on outside help and AI use, and you are responsible for following them. We are independent and not affiliated with any of them. If you're unsure what your module allows, ask us first.
Technical work uses the technical rate per 250 words, and problem sets can be quoted per question; your deadline sets the band. Fixing or finishing is priced only on what is needed. You get a written SGD quote before paying.
Tell us which part doesn't match and the same engineer revises it. Revisions against your original brief are free.
No legitimate service can guarantee a grade. We promise working to your brief, every step shown, a second check before delivery and free revisions against your instructions.
Before the deadline
Send your problem sheet or report now. An engineer replies within 15 minutes, and you get a written SGD quote before any work starts.
100% online · Reply within 15 minutes · Clear SGD quote first · PDPA compliant